1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C70 weights approximately 640 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C70 (350 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01. 2012 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda RX-01 | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | RX-01 | C70 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2615 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4582 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |
