1996 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 48 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda RX-7 | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | RX-7 | Tempest |
Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 3524 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2930 mm |