1996 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. (258 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda RX-7 | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | RX-7 | 280 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2778 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2410 mm |
