1996 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1981 Renault 18
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault 18 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1981 Renault 18. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault 18.
Because 1996 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault 18. (181 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda RX-7 | 1981 Renault 18 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-7 | 18 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 181 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1410 mm |