1996 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2001 Rover 75
To start off, 2001 Rover 75 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2001 Rover 75. (177 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2001 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 80 kg more than 2001 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 75 (325 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2001 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda RX-7 | 2001 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | RX-7 | 75 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1230 kg |
