1996 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2004 Volvo XC90. (208 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 728 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda RX-7 | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | RX-7 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2038 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 72 L |
