1996 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2008 Proton Arena
To start off, 2008 Proton Arena is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 267 kg more than 2008 Proton Arena.
Because 1996 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Proton Arena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Proton Arena. (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Proton Arena.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda RX-7 | 2008 Proton Arena | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | RX-7 | Arena |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1468 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 50 L |