1996 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2009 Saturn Vue
To start off, 2009 Saturn Vue is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 3,562 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Vue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Vue (249 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-7. (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Vue should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Because 1996 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Vue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Saturn Vue. (251 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Saturn Vue.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda RX-7 | 2009 Saturn Vue | |
Make | Mazda | Saturn |
Model | RX-7 | Vue |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 3562 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 249 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 61 L |