1996 Mazda Sentia vs. 1960 Simca Plein Ceil
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Simca Plein Ceil would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 500 kg more than 1960 Simca Plein Ceil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mazda Sentia has automatic transmission and 1960 Simca Plein Ceil has manual transmission. 1960 Simca Plein Ceil will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mazda Sentia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda Sentia | 1960 Simca Plein Ceil | |
| Make | Mazda | Simca |
| Model | Sentia | Plein Ceil |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1960 |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 56 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 42 L |
