1996 Mazda Sentia vs. 1973 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,689 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda Sentia | 1973 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | Sentia | Valiant |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2952 cc | 3689 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2830 mm |
