1996 Mazda Sentia vs. 1975 Simca 1100
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 2,952 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 690 kg more than 1975 Simca 1100.
Because 1996 Mazda Sentia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda Sentia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Simca 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mazda Sentia has automatic transmission and 1975 Simca 1100 has manual transmission. 1975 Simca 1100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mazda Sentia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda Sentia | 1975 Simca 1100 | |
Make | Mazda | Simca |
Model | Sentia | 1100 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2952 cc | 1118 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 65 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 47 L |