1996 Mazda Sentia vs. 1993 Oldsmobile Achieva
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Oldsmobile Achieva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Oldsmobile Achieva would be higher. At 2,952 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 290 kg more than 1993 Oldsmobile Achieva.
Because 1996 Mazda Sentia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda Sentia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Oldsmobile Achieva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda Sentia | 1993 Oldsmobile Achieva | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Sentia | Achieva |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1993 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2952 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
