1996 Mazda Sentia vs. 1998 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1998 Mercury Villager is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Sentia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Sentia would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercury Villager weights approximately 240 kg more than 1996 Mazda Sentia.
Because 1996 Mazda Sentia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda Sentia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda Sentia | 1998 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | Sentia | Villager |
Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2952 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 149 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2860 mm |