1996 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz C (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 240 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz C (170 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercedes-Benz C | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
Model | C | 2000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.3 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |