1996 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz C (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mercedes-Benz C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercedes-Benz C | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | C | Ranger |
Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |