1996 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1963 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 600 kg more than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercedes-Benz E | 1963 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | E | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2390 mm |