1996 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (583 HP) has 494 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1132 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (721 Nm) has 563 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mercedes-Benz E | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
| Model | E | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7255 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 583 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 721 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2302 kg | 1170 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |
