1996 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1965 Wartburg 311
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Wartburg 311. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Wartburg 311 would be higher. At 4,266 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (275 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1965 Wartburg 311. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1965 Wartburg 311. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1092 kg more than 1965 Wartburg 311. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (400 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Wartburg 311. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Wartburg 311.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercedes-Benz E | 1965 Wartburg 311 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Wartburg |
Model | E | 311 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4266 cc | 899 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 6.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2052 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 43 L |