1996 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1966 Mercury Cyclone
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cyclone. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cyclone would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (583 HP) has 248 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Cyclone. (335 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Cyclone. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 670 kg more than 1966 Mercury Cyclone. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (721 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mercury Cyclone. (579 Nm). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mercury Cyclone.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercedes-Benz E | 1966 Mercury Cyclone | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercury |
Model | E | Cyclone |
Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7255 cc | 6393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 583 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 721 Nm | 579 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2302 kg | 1632 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2950 mm |