1996 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (583 HP) has 468 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (115 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1137 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (721 Nm) has 549 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Celica. (172 Nm). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercedes-Benz E | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | E | Celica |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7255 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 583 HP | 115 HP |
Torque | 721 Nm | 172 Nm |
Top Speed | 331 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2302 kg | 1165 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2620 mm |