1996 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,266 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (275 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 872 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (400 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mercedes-Benz E | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | E | Celica |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4266 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2052 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2640 mm |
