1996 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1986 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 4,266 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (275 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 877 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mercedes-Benz E | 1986 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Plymouth |
| Model | E | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4266 cc | 2211 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2052 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2470 mm |
