1996 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 4,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (343 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 229 kg more than 1996 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (480 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercedes-Benz E | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | E | SSU |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4973 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 343 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1676 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 71 L |