1996 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2004 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 4,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (343 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 4 kg more than 1996 Mercedes-Benz E.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (480 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercedes-Benz E | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Suzuki |
Model | E | XL7 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4973 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 343 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1676 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.5 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.5 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |