1996 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover

To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (583 HP) has 208 more horse power than 2010 Land Rover Range Rover. (375 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2010 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 282 kg more than 1996 Mercedes-Benz E.

Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (721 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Land Rover Range Rover. (508 Nm). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Land Rover Range Rover.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Mercedes-Benz E 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
Make Mercedes-Benz Land Rover
Model E Range Rover
Year Released 1996 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7255 cc 5000 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 583 HP 375 HP
Torque 721 Nm 508 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2302 kg 2584 kg
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2878 mm