1996 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2011 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (583 HP) has 414 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu. (169 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (721 Nm) has 504 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu. (217 Nm). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mercedes-Benz E | 2011 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Chevrolet |
| Model | E | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7255 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 583 HP | 169 HP |
| Torque | 721 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2852 mm |
