1996 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (583 HP) has 305 more horse power than 2012 Holden Calais. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Calais.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (721 Nm) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mercedes-Benz E | 2012 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
| Model | E | Calais |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7255 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 583 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 721 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
