1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 vs. 1962 Zastava 750
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (408 HP) has 384 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 weights approximately 800 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 has automatic transmission and 1962 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1962 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | 1962 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
Model | F200 | 750 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 5987 cc | 766 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 408 HP | 24 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 605 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2010 mm |