1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (408 HP) has 334 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 has automatic transmission and 2004 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: