1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 vs. 2004 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (408 HP) has 334 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 599 kg more than 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | 2004 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volkswagen |
Model | F200 | Caddy |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5987 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 408 HP | 74 HP |
Top Speed | 259 km/hour | 148 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 2004 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2590 mm |