1996 Mercedes-Benz G vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz G would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1996 Mercedes-Benz G. (217 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1996 Mercedes-Benz G.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz G is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz G will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mercedes-Benz G. (300 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mercedes-Benz G.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercedes-Benz G | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jaguar |
Model | G | XF |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2908 mm |