1996 Mercedes-Benz S vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz S (275 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz S (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mercedes-Benz S | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
| Model | S | 102 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1340 mm |
