1996 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1989 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 625 kg more than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1989 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Plymouth |
Model | SL | Sundance |
Year Released | 1996 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5987 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 376 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2470 mm |