1996 Mercury Cougar vs. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1996 Mercury Cougar is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 120 kg more than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Cougar | 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Mercury | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Cougar | 6C |
Year Released | 1996 | 1938 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3798 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |