1996 Mercury Cougar vs. 1953 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 1996 Mercury Cougar is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 436 kg more than 1953 Singer SM 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Cougar | 1953 Singer SM 1500 | |
Make | Mercury | Singer |
Model | Cougar | SM 1500 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3798 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 57 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1184 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1610 mm |