1996 Mercury Cougar vs. 1964 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1996 Mercury Cougar is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 636 kg more than 1964 Zastava 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mercury Cougar | 1964 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Mercury | Zastava |
| Model | Cougar | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 3798 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
