1996 Mercury Cougar vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Mercury Cougar is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 450 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Cougar | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mercury | Triumph |
Model | Cougar | 2000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3798 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |