1996 Mercury Cougar vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1996 Mercury Cougar is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 586 kg more than 1996 Mercury Cougar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Cougar | 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Mercury | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Cougar | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3798 cc | 6749 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |