1996 Mercury Cougar vs. 1986 Zastava Yugo
To start off, 1996 Mercury Cougar is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Zastava Yugo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Zastava Yugo would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 818 kg more than 1986 Zastava Yugo.
Because 1996 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Zastava Yugo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mercury Cougar | 1986 Zastava Yugo | |
| Make | Mercury | Zastava |
| Model | Cougar | Yugo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3798 cc | 1116 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 55 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 802 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
