1996 Mercury Cougar vs. 2001 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2001 Dodge Ram is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,905 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Dodge Ram weights approximately 450 kg more than 1996 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2001 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mercury Cougar | 2001 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Mercury | Dodge |
| Model | Cougar | Ram |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3798 cc | 3905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
