1996 Mercury Cougar vs. 2010 Acura RDX
To start off, 2010 Acura RDX is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura RDX weights approximately 163 kg more than 1996 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2010 Acura RDX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Cougar | 2010 Acura RDX | |
Make | Mercury | Acura |
Model | Cougar | RDX |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3798 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1783 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4636 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1869 mm |