1996 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 1966 Mini MK I
To start off, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1966 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Grand Marquis | 1966 Mini MK I | |
Make | Mercury | Mini |
Model | Grand Marquis | MK I |
Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1420 mm |