1996 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis (208 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 805 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Grand Marquis | 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
Model | Grand Marquis | Celeste |
Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1620 mm |