1996 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 1989 Renault 4
To start off, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1989 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1989 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1989 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Grand Marquis | 1989 Renault 4 | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Grand Marquis | 4 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1490 mm |