1996 Mercury Villager vs. 1953 Plymouth Cambridge
To start off, 1996 Mercury Villager is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Plymouth Cambridge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Plymouth Cambridge would be higher. At 3,569 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Plymouth Cambridge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1953 Plymouth Cambridge. (97 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1953 Plymouth Cambridge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 405 kg more than 1953 Plymouth Cambridge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Plymouth Cambridge is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Plymouth Cambridge. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Villager | 1953 Plymouth Cambridge | |
Make | Mercury | Plymouth |
Model | Villager | Cambridge |
Year Released | 1996 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 3569 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2900 mm |