1996 Mercury Villager vs. 1989 Volvo 740

To start off, 1996 Mercury Villager is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volvo 740. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volvo 740 would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1989 Volvo 740. (116 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1989 Volvo 740. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 540 kg more than 1989 Volvo 740. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1989 Volvo 740 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Volvo 740. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications: