1996 Mercury Villager vs. 1998 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1998 Toyota Celica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1998 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1998 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 705 kg more than 1998 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mercury Villager | 1998 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mercury | Toyota |
| Model | Villager | Celica |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2960 cc | 1762 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1760 mm |
