1996 Mercury Villager vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1996 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 1360 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Villager | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Mercury | Westfield |
Model | Villager | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2320 mm |