1996 Mercury Villager vs. 2006 MG TF
To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 MG TF. (135 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2006 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 620 kg more than 2006 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Villager | 2006 MG TF | |
Make | Mercury | MG |
Model | Villager | TF |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2380 mm |