1996 Mercury Villager vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1996 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1996 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 406 kg more than 2010 Jeep Compass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mercury Villager | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Mercury | Jeep |
Model | Villager | Compass |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1394 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2634 mm |